Understanding Word Embeddings in NLP: A Deep Dive.

1. Introduction

Mohamed Bakrey Mahmoud
6 min readFeb 10, 2025
  • Define word embeddings and their importance in NLP.
  • Explain why traditional methods like one-hot encoding and TF-IDF have limitations.

2. What Are Word Embeddings?

  • Explain how word embeddings represent words as dense vectors in continuous space.
  • Discuss the concept of semantic similarity (words with similar meanings have closer vector representations).

3. Popular Word Embedding Techniques

  • Word2Vec: Explain Skip-gram and CBOW models.
  • GloVe: Describe how it captures word co-occurrence statistics.
  • FastText: Explain its subword-based approach for better handling of rare words.
  • Transformer-based Embeddings: Briefly mention contextual embeddings like BERT and GPT.

4. Applications of Word Embeddings

  • Sentiment analysis
  • Text classification
  • Chatbots and conversational AI
  • Machine translation
  • Named Entity Recognition (NER)

5. Challenges and Limitations

  • Handling out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words
  • Bias in word embeddings
  • Computational cost and storage requirements

6. Future Trends

  • Contextual embeddings replacing static embeddings
  • Fine-tuning transformer models for domain-specific applications
  • Ethical considerations in mitigating bias

7. Conclusion

  • Summarize the importance of word embeddings.
  • Provide recommendations for choosing the right embedding method based on the use case.
  • Encourage further research and experimentation.

1. Introduction

In Natural Language Processing (NLP), machines need to understand human language, but computers can only process numbers. Traditionally, words were represented using methods like one-hot encoding and TF-IDF (Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency). However, these techniques have limitations:

  • One-hot encoding creates sparse, high-dimensional vectors that don’t capture semantic relationships between words.
  • TF-IDF focuses on word frequency but lacks contextual understanding.

Word embeddings were introduced to solve these problems. Word embeddings are dense vector representations of words, allowing NLP models to understand word meanings and relationships efficiently.

2. What Are Word Embeddings?

Word embeddings map words to continuous vector spaces where similar words are placed closer together. Unlike traditional representations, embeddings capture both semantic and syntactic meanings of words.

For example:

  • The word “king” is closer to “queen” than to “car” in vector space.
  • Relationships like man → king, woman → queen can be represented mathematically (king — man + woman = queen).

Word embeddings are pre-trained on large corpora and generalize well across NLP tasks.

3. Popular Word Embedding Techniques

3.1 Word2Vec (Mikolov et al., 2013)

Word2Vec uses two architectures to learn word representations:

  1. Continuous Bag of Words (CBOW) — Predicts the target word from surrounding context words.
  2. Skip-Gram Model — Predicts surrounding context words from a given word.

Key Advantage:

  • Captures word similarities based on their usage in sentences.

Example: If trained on a large corpus, “king” and “queen” will have similar vector representations.

3.2 GloVe (Global Vectors for Word Representation, 2014)

GloVe is a word embedding model developed by Stanford NLP researchers. Unlike Word2Vec, which predicts words based on local context, GloVe focuses on global co-occurrence statistics of words.

Key Advantage:

  • More effective for capturing long-range dependencies.
  • Learns word relationships based on how often words appear together in a corpus.

3.3 FastText (Facebook AI, 2016)

FastText improves Word2Vec by using subword information. Instead of treating a word as a whole, it breaks it down into n-grams (subword units).

Example: The word “apple” might be broken into subwords like “app”, “ple”, and “le”.

Key Advantage:

  • Handles rare words and misspellings better than Word2Vec and GloVe.
  • Useful for morphologically rich languages like German, Finnish, and Turkish.

3.4 Contextual Embeddings (BERT, GPT, etc.)

Traditional embeddings like Word2Vec, GloVe, and FastText generate static embeddings, meaning a word has the same vector regardless of its context.

Example: The word “bank” has the same embedding in:

  1. “I deposited money in the bank.”
  2. “The river bank was flooded.”

However, models like BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) and GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) generate contextual embeddings, meaning the vector representation changes based on the sentence’s meaning.

Key Advantage:

  • Captures polysemy (multiple meanings of a word).
  • Significantly improves performance in NLP tasks.

4. Applications of Word Embeddings

Word embeddings have revolutionized NLP, enabling applications such as:

4.1 Sentiment Analysis

Understanding emotions in text (e.g., classifying reviews as positive or negative).

4.2 Text Classification

Used in spam detection, news categorization, and topic modeling.

4.3 Chatbots & Conversational AI

Embeddings help chatbots understand the context and provide human-like responses.

4.4 Machine Translation

Used in translation models like Google Translate for better word alignment across languages.

4.5 Named Entity Recognition (NER)

Identifying entities like names, locations, and organizations in text.

5. Challenges and Limitations

5.1 Handling Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) Words

  • Word2Vec and GloVe cannot handle words not present in the training corpus.
  • FastText solves this by using subword embeddings.

5.2 Bias in Word Embeddings

  • Word embeddings inherit biases from the training data.
  • Example: Word2Vec has been found to encode gender biases (e.g., “man” → “doctor” and “woman” → “nurse”).
  • Ongoing research aims to de-bias embeddings using fairness-aware algorithms.

5.3 Computational Cost and Storage

  • Training embeddings on large corpora requires significant computational power.
  • Pre-trained embeddings (Word2Vec, GloVe, BERT) offer a practical alternative.

6. Future Trends in Word Embeddings

6.1 Contextual Embeddings Replacing Static Embeddings

Models like BERT and GPT are gradually replacing traditional static embeddings.

6.2 Domain-Specific Embeddings

  • Pre-trained embeddings fine-tuned for specific industries (e.g., medical, legal, finance).

6.3 Ethical Considerations and Bias Mitigation

  • Researchers are working on debiasing embeddings to reduce discrimination in AI models.

7. Conclusion

Word embeddings have transformed NLP by providing meaningful word representations. Whether you choose Word2Vec, GloVe, FastText, or BERT, the right embedding depends on your task, dataset, and computational resources.

If you’re starting in NLP, try using pre-trained embeddings and experiment with fine-tuning them for your applications. As AI continues to evolve, embeddings will play a crucial role in improving language understanding.

Here are some code snippets and visualizations to understand more about the topic:

1. Loading Pre-trained Word2Vec Embeddings using Gensim

import gensim.downloader as api
# Load pre-trained Word2Vec model (Google News, 300 dimensions)
word2vec_model = api.load("word2vec-google-news-300")
# Find similar words
similar_words = word2vec_model.most_similar("king", topn=5)
print(similar_words)

Expected Output:

[('queen', 0.78), ('prince', 0.75), ('monarch', 0.74), ('emperor', 0.73), ('throne', 0.72)]

This shows that “king” is semantically close to “queen”, “prince”, and “monarch” in the embedding space.

2. Visualizing Word Embeddings using PCA

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
# Select words to visualize
words = ["king", "queen", "man", "woman", "prince", "princess", "doctor", "nurse"]
vectors = [word2vec_model[word] for word in words]
# Reduce dimensionality to 2D
pca = PCA(n_components=2)
reduced_vectors = pca.fit_transform(vectors)
# Plot the words
plt.figure(figsize=(8, 6))
for i, word in enumerate(words):
plt.scatter(reduced_vectors[i, 0], reduced_vectors[i, 1])
plt.text(reduced_vectors[i, 0] + 0.02, reduced_vectors[i, 1] + 0.02, word, fontsize=12)
plt.title("2D Visualization of Word Embeddings (PCA)")
plt.show()

This visualization shows how similar words cluster together in 2D space.

3. Using FastText for Out-of-Vocabulary (OOV) Words

from gensim.models import FastText
# Train a simple FastText model
sentences = [["deep", "learning", "is", "amazing"], ["word", "embeddings", "are", "powerful"]]
fasttext_model = FastText(sentences, vector_size=10, window=3, min_count=1, epochs=10)
# Get vector for a known word
print(fasttext_model.wv["learning"])
# Get vector for an unseen word (misspelled)
print(fasttext_model.wv["learninng"]) # Still generates a vector!

Unlike Word2Vec, FastText can generate embeddings for misspelled or unseen words.

4. Using BERT to Generate Contextual Word Embeddings

from transformers import BertTokenizer, BertModel
import torch
# Load pre-trained BERT model and tokenizer
tokenizer = BertTokenizer.from_pretrained('bert-base-uncased')
model = BertModel.from_pretrained('bert-base-uncased')
# Encode a sentence
sentence = "The bank is located near the river."
tokens = tokenizer(sentence, return_tensors="pt")
# Get word embeddings from BERT
with torch.no_grad():
output = model(**tokens)
# Get the embedding for the word 'bank'
bank_embedding = output.last_hidden_state[0][1] # 'bank' token index
print(bank_embedding.shape) # Output: torch.Size([768])

You can find the Code with run here: https://github.com/mohamedbakrey12/Full_Project/blob/main/Word_Embedding.ipynb

--

--

Mohamed Bakrey Mahmoud
Mohamed Bakrey Mahmoud

No responses yet